|
|
Introduction Music
publishing constitutes a major source of revenue for composers.[1] Composers earn revenue by reproducing,
selling, and licensing their work.
When a composer signs a contract with a publishing company, that company
takes over several responsibilities including that of reproducing, selling and
licensing the composer’s work. Composers
also earn revenue when their music is publicly performed. During the 20th century
music publishers were tasked with persuading entertainers to publicly perform
musical compositions in order to stimulate the sale of printed editions and
player piano rolls, and create revenue for the composers and themselves.[2] Due to the expansion of technology for
merchandising music, there are many ways in which a composer and publishing
company can earn revenue today. “As
the complexity and size of the music publishing industry increases, so does the
amount of money that can be earned within it.”[3]
One hit song can make a composer very affluent. Music
publishing is seen as a good way to make money because the company that uses
the composition in a sound recording usually does the marketing and promotion
of the music.[4] Marketing and promotion are the hardest
part of selling music and can be very costly.[5] Publishing catalogs have become
valuable and currently sell for eight to fifteen times their average annual
income, and some at even higher rates.[6]
“Major financial institutional investors are always on the hunt for music
publishing catalogs. Songs are
like oil wells; they keep pumping revenues year after year.”[7]
What Do Music Publishing Companies Do? Music
publishing companies assist composers by reproducing, selling, and licensing
their work.[8] Music publishing companies authorize
the sale of songs, and receive revenue in return, in which it shares with the
composer.[9] Music publishers perform many other
tasks for the composers. These
include copyrighting musical compositions in the United States and in foreign
countries.[10] If a publishing company finds that
someone is infringing on musical compositions, it will sue and negotiate
settlements, when appropriate.[11] Protecting the publishers copyrights
and enforcing the rights it has been granted by the writer and the U.S.
copyright laws, is very important to both the writer and the publishing
company.[12] “The good publisher will spend a great
deal of time and money to ensure that its songs are not used without permission
and compensation.”[13] Music
publishing companies also arrange for the manufacturing and distribution of
sheet music and composer compilations.[14] A music publishing company properly
registers songs with performance rights organizations, such as American Society
of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP), Broadcast Music, Inc. (BMI), and
SESAC.[15]
Music publishing companies negotiate fees and issue appropriate licenses for
all uses of music.[16] Music publishing companies may even
keep track of motion pictures, television shows, commercials, etc., so that
compatible songs can be submitted to producers for possible inclusion in their
production; this is also known as “pitching.”[17] Sources of Music Publishing Company Income Music publishing companies assist composers by
licensing their works.[18]
There are a number of licenses that support the composer and provide
income to the music publishing companies.
Among them are licenses for mechanical royalties, performance rights,
synchronization, print rights, lyric reprint, samples, digital media, grand
rights, and foreign income.[19] The licenses discussed for mechanicals,
performance rights, synchronization, print, lyric print, samples, and digital
media are all considered “small rights.”[20] Small rights are non dramatic public
performing rights.[21] Grand rights are dramatic performing
rights.[22]
Mechanical Royalties Mechanical
royalties are based on the number of units sold to the public that contain
songs written by the composer, and are paid to the composer.[23] Any sound recording artist can record a
new version of a song (known as a “cover”) and pay the mechanical royalties set
by statute to the music publisher; this is known as a compulsory mechanical
license.[24] The statutory rate for
mechanicals is currently 9.1 cents per song or 1.75 cents per minute whichever
is greater.[25] The mechanical royalty rate is adjusted
every two years by the U.S. Copyright Royalty Board, and normally rises in
accordance with the rise in the costs of living.[26] The statutory rate for mechanicals is
the same whether the song is a single, major hit, or a flop.[27] When
a composer signs a contract with a music publisher, the publisher takes over
the responsibility of collecting all types of royalties.[28] The publisher can collect all
mechanical royalties by issuing licenses and collecting royalties itself or by
using an agency such as The Harry Fox Agency.[29] If the publisher issues a mechanical
license for the composition, the record company that manufactures recordings of
the composition pursuant to that license pays the mechanical income to the
publisher.[30] Under a mechanical license, the record
company is required to account to the publisher, meaning the record company
must render a written statement that details the amounts collected, and makes a
payment to the publisher, on a quarterly basis; audits are permitted.[31] Once the publisher receives payment it
splits the mechanical royalties with the composers that own the copyright in
the composition.[32] A
publishing company may contract with The Harry Fox Agency to issue mechanical
licenses. The Harry Fox Agency,
established in 1927, licenses the use of a copyrighted musical composition for
use on CDs, records, tapes, and certain digital configurations.[33]
On the Harry Fox website it states that its mechanical license does not include
the right to display or reprint lyrics or the right to print sheet music, nor
does it cover the use of the songs on karaoke machines.[34] Instead, it advises reader to contact
the publisher(s) directly for those rights.[35]
Even if a publisher uses The Harry Fox Agency for mechanical licensing, the
publisher remains responsible for issuing other types of licenses. When
a composer is signed to a record company as a recording artist, the record
company requests a controlled composition rate from the publisher.[36]
The controlled composition rate is usually 75% of the minimum statutory
mechanical rate per composition.[37] To avoid the 1.75 cents per minute
rate, the record company will almost always contract that the minute rate will
not apply in the calculation of mechanicals.[38] Performance Rights In
the United States, the copyright laws require that compensation be paid to the
copyright owners of the musical composition for the public performance of their
work.[39] Some common areas where compensation is
paid to copyright owners for public performance are with concert promoters,
nightclubs, radio stations, TV stations and elevators.[40]
These people and locations pay fees to performance rights societies in exchange
for the right to publicly perform or broadcast music.[41] Performing
rights organizations exist for several reasons.[42] It is impractical, inefficient, and
costly for copyright owners to license the right to publicly perform their
compositions to every music user separately, and, it is also impractical,
inefficient, and costly for music users to keep track of copyright owners and
negotiate individual licensees to authorize the performance of each copyrighted
work.[43] The
United States has three performing rights organizations, ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC.[44] These organizations collect public
performance income. These organizations sell single use, single fee licenses,
and blanket licenses.[45]
A blanket license gives the
licensee the right to exploit any song in the organizations catalogue for a
fee. Id. Performing rights
organizations divide the performance income into a 50/50 split.[46]
Fifty percent is paid directly to
the composer and fifty percent is paid to the publisher.[47] The first is known as the writer’s
share and the latter as the publisher’s share.[48] The performing rights societies collect
the fees, deduct their costs of administration, then divide the money and
distribute it directly to their members composers and publishers, based on the
number of public performances of each particular song as discerned through a
combination of a complete count of public performances known as “census
surveys,” and sample surveys.[49] The higher percentage play of a
particular song, the more revenue the owner receives.[50] Where
do the publishers come in? Once a
composer has signed a contract with a music publisher, it is the publisher’s
job to register musical compositions with the performance rights society, so
that the writer can be paid for all the public performances of his or her
composition.[51] The
publisher in return gets its 50% share, the publisher’s share.[52] Synchronization Publishing
companies also negotiate synchronization licenses. A synchronization license gives a user the right to bundle the
composition together in timed relation with visual images or motion pictures.[53]
Any time a film, television show, or video game
producer uses music that accompanies their work it must obtain this license.[54]
Again, once a composer has signed a contract with a music publisher the
publisher takes over the responsibility of negotiating, drafting, issuing the
license, and collecting all the monies due from the license.[55]
If the producer wants to use a particular sound recording of the composition,
then he must also obtain a master license in the sound recording. The producer can usually obtain the
master license from the record label of the recording artist. Print Rights A music publisher takes over
the responsibility of arranging for sheet music manufacturing.[56] Some publishers do not print and
manufacture their own edition of the composition but instead license the rights
to another company that specializes in the task.[57] The publisher then hires the sheet
music manufacturer, negotiates the license fees, drafts the license agreement
and collects all monies due.[58] A publisher that does not print and
manufacture its own edition and instead licenses those rights to another
company, is customarily paid 20% of the wholesale selling price, which is then
split fifty-fifty with the writer.[59] Lyric Reprints When someone wants permission
to reprint song lyrics, either in album liner notes, on Web sites or wherever
else lyrics are printed or used, they must obtain a reprint license.[60]
Once a composer has signed a
contract with a music publisher, the publisher takes over this responsibility
of clearing lyric reprints, which includes negotiating the reprint license fee,
drafting the license agreement, and collecting all monies due.[61] Samples Music
publishing companies also negotiate sample licenses for their composers.[62]
Sampling can occur in many
different forms. One example is
when the recording artist or record producer uses a portion of an existing song
as a bridge, insert, or portion of a new song.[63] Sampling can also occur when the
recording artist or producer uses an instrumental portion of an existing master
recording and inserts it into a newly recorded master.[64]
In order to use a sample the creator of the new work must obtain the original composer’s
permission in the sample license and also a master license from the owner of
the sound recording.[65] Once a composer signs a contract with a
publisher the publisher takes over the responsibility of clearing the sample
licenses for the composition.[66] The publishing company takes over all
clearance procedures consisting of negotiating the sample license fees,
drafting the license agreements and collecting all monies due.[67] The publishing company usually
negotiates an up-front license fee and a percentage share of the ownership of
the new composition, in this situation.[68]
Digital Media The new use of copyright
materials in digital media can also generate additional royalties for owners of
copyrights.[69] Some of these digital medias are “monophonic
ringtones,” “ringbacks,” “master ringtones,” and “digital downloads.”[70] The Harry Fox Agency, traditionally
dealt with mechanical licenses covering CDs, records and tapes. Id. More recently, the Register of
Copyrights of the U.S. Copyright Office issued an administrative ruling the
held that ringtones (including monophonic ringtones, polyphonic ringtones and
master ringtones) are also subject to compulsory licenses.[71]
The Harry Fox Agency has also begun issuing licenses and collecting royalties
for “digital licenses” including full downloads, limited-use downloads,
on-demand streaming and CD burning.[72] The Harry Fox Agency is not
alone; performance rights societies now license songs for use on Web sites and
as ringtones.[73] In circumstances where digital media is
not covered, publishers are “currently sailing in uncharted waters as they
negotiate fees for these new types of licenses of digitized music.”[74] Grand Rights Grand rights are the right to
publicly perform, in whole or in part, dramatic works that combine musical
works with dramatic settings.[75] The music publisher takes over the
responsibility of clearing the grand rights, by negotiating the license fees,
drafting the license agreements and collecting all monies due.[76] Foreign Income Domestic publishers do not
generally have access to foreign licensing.[77] Thus domestic publishers enter into
foreign licensing or sub publishing agreements with music publishers that
operate outside the United States.[78] This allows the domestic publishers to
collect more money or behalf of the composer but also collect its share from
foreign countries.[79] The more successful commercial composers
often retain foreign rights and make their own sub publishing deals.[80] Music
Publishing Deals Full publishing deals are not
as common today.[81] The traditional division of income
between the composer and publisher in a full publishing deal is a fifty-fifty
split.[82] The writer keeps their writer’s share
under all circumstances.[83] If a composer signs a full publishing
contract, it gives the publisher sole ownership of the copyrights contained in
the composer’s catalog, for the total length of the copyright.[84]
Most composer’s attorneys
negotiate for co-publishing deals.[85]
If a composer signs a co-publishing deal the writer holds onto half the
ownership of the copyrights in their catalogue.[86] Many of the modern co-publishing deals
provide for a reversion in the copyrights to the composer.[87] Those reversions are usually subject to
the recoupment of any advances from the publisher to the composer, and take
place 7 to 12 years after the song is first delivered to the publisher.[88] Co-publishing agreements also have a traditional division of
income at a fifty-fifty split, but this split refers to the income representing
the music publisher’s share.[89]
Under a co-publishing deal, the writer keeps their writer’s share under all
circumstances.[90] For
clarity, in a standard full publishing contract the writer usually receives 50%
of the net income earned from the use of his or her songs, and the publisher
receives the other 50%.[91] Under a co-publishing agreement, the
writer not only receives his or her 50% share of the composer income but also receives
a 50% share of the publisher’s share.[92]
This means the writer ends up with 75% of the share. Co-publishing deals are advantageous to the writer because
the co-publisher usually takes over the administration of the catalogue.[93] If the co-publisher takes over the
administration then it will usually charge a fee of 5-10% for its services.[94] Administration
Deals Composers may also enter into
administration deals. In this type
of deal, the publisher does not share in ownership of the composer’s copyrights,
and so the composer retains 100% of the catalogue.[95]
The term for an administration deal usually range from three to ten years.[96] The administration fee is generally
between 10-20% and for the fee the administrator is responsible for negotiating
contracts, collecting monies and accounting to the writer based on these
collections.[97] Some administrators will also “pitch”
songs, meaning they solicit uses of the music in the catalogue.[98]
“Administration agreements usually provide that if the administrator secures a
cover recording, the administrator will retain administration rights for a
longer period of time and obtain a higher percentage of the income generated by
the cover secured by the administrator.”[99] Administration deals seem
like the better deal.[100] The composer gets to retain all rights
in the copyright of its works and the administrator negotiates, issues, and
collects money based on the licenses it issues.[101] Administration agreements are difficult
to obtain for independent composers.[102] The major music publishers rarely enter
into administration deals, except for superstar writers, because they prefer
the full publishing or co publishing deals.[103]Although
it is not common there are administrators that will sign composers to an
administration deal. One of the
leaders in this market is The Royalty Network located in both California and
New York.[104] * The author would like to thank Richard
Greenstone for his insight and editing of this article. Article Copyright © 2012 Rachal
Ranteesi. [1]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 139 (4th Ed. 2008). [2]
Id. [3]
Id. [4]
Id. [5]
Id. [6]
Id. [7] Id. [8]
Sherri L. Burr, Entertainment Law: In a
Nutshell 61 (2004). [9]
Id. [10]
Jeffrey Brabec, Music Money and Success:
The Insider’s Guide to Making Money in the Music Business 3 (6th Ed.
2008). [11]
Id. [12]
Id at 6. [13]
Id. [14]
Id. at 3. [15]
Id. [16]
Id. [17]
Id., see also Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s Business and Legal Guide 148
(4th Ed. 2008). [18] Sherri L. Burr, Entertainment Law: In a Nutshell 61 (2004). [19] Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s Business and Legal Guide 140-146 (4th Ed. 2008). [20]
Id. at 140. [21]
Id. [22] Id. [23]
Id. [24]
Id. at 135. [25]
Id. at 141. [26]
Id. [27]
Id. [28]
Id. [29]
Id. [30]
Id. [31]
Id. [32]
Sherri L. Burr, Entertainment Law: In a
Nutshell 61 (2004). [33] Id.; see also The Harry Fox Agency (visited on March 21, 2012) <http://www.harryfox.com/public/MechanicalLicenseslic.jsp>. [34]
The Harry Fox Agency (visited on March
21, 2012) <http://www.harryfox.com/public/MechanicalLicenseslic.jsp>. [35]
Id. [36] Jeffrey Brabec, Music Money and Success: The Insider’s Guide to Making Money in the Music Business 149 (6th Ed. 2008). [37]
Id. [38] Id. [39]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 142 (4th Ed. 2008). [40]
Id.; see also Sherri L. Burr,
Entertainment Law: In a Nutshell 62 (2004). [41]
Id. [42]
Id. [43]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 142 (4th Ed. 2008). [44]
Id. [45] Sherri L. Burr, Entertainment Law: In a Nutshell 62 (2004). [46]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 142 (4th Ed. 2008). [47]
Id. [48]
Id. [49]
Id. [50]
Sherri L. Burr, Entertainment Law: In a
Nutshell 62-63 (2004). [51]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 142 (4th Ed. 2008). [52] Id. [53]
Sherri L. Burr, Entertainment Law: In a
Nutshell 61 (2004). [54] Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s Business and Legal Guide 144 (4th Ed. 2008). [55]
Id. [56]
Id. [57]
Id. [58]
Id. [59]
Id. [60]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 144 (4th Ed. 2008). [61] Id. [62]
Id. at 143. [63] Jeffrey Brabec, Music Money and Success: The Insider’s Guide to Making Money in the Music Business 163 (6th Ed. 2008). [64] Id. [65]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 143 (4th Ed. 2008). [66]
Id. [67]
Id. [68]
Id. [69]
Id. at 141. [70] Id. [71]
Memorandum Opinion “In the Matter of Mechanical and Digital Phonorecord
Delivery Rate Adjustment Proceeding,” U.S. Copyright Office (Copyright Royalty
Board 2006) Docket No. RF 2006-1; See
also 17 U.S.C. §115. [72]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 145 (4th Ed. 2008 [73]
Id. [74]
Id. [75]
Id. at 146. [76]
Id. [77]
Id. [78] Id. [79]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 146 (4th Ed. 2008). [80]
Id. [81]
Id. [82]
Id. at 147. [83]
Id. [84]
Id. [85]
Id. [86]
Id. [87]
Id. [88]
Id. [89]
Jeffrey Brabec, Music Money and Success:
The Insider’s Guide to Making Money in the Music Business 59 (6th
Ed. 2008). [90]
Id. [91] Id. [92]
Id. [93]
Id. [94]
Mark Halloran, ESQ., The Musician’s
Business and Legal Guide 148 (4th Ed. 2008). [95]
Id. [96]
Id. [97]
Id. [98] Id. [99]
Id. [100]
Id. [101]
Id. [102]
Id. [103]
Id. [104]
Id.; see also <http://www.roynet.com/>. |
||
![]()
![]()
![]()
Law Bytes is the place you will find our most recent articles, newsletters and other interesting items about the areas of law that comprise our practice: copyright, trademark, trade secret, licensing, business and transactional law for the computer, entertainment and publishing industries. The observant reader will note that Law Bytes periodically changes its name to Law Bites when the need to report an unjust, unfair result is too good to pass up.
The Big Apple by Richard Greenstone, 1975
Publishing in the Music Industry: A Primer*
by
Rachal Ranteesi